Monday, September 3, 2012

The Obama Conundrum


I’ll go out on a limb and predict that Obama will lose the general election by a landslide. Here’s why. The campaign has to take one of two positions on the economy: 1) The economy is better now than when he took office or 2) It is worse.

Arguing that the economy is better has two problems. Firstly, that argument is easily refuted. Taking that position calls into question the credibility of the proponent. The unemployment rate is higher and climbing, according to The Bureau of Labor Statistics.1 Average national gasoline prices are $3.80 today, up from $1.80 on inauguration day.2 Food prices are up 48% since February 2009.3 Perhaps the biggest drag on the economy is the housing crisis. Home foreclosure rates during the term have been sky high. And there is no end in sight - nearly 13 million home loans are underwater - meaning the loan balance is more than the house is worth, and are ticking time bombs.4 And the housing industry has widespread influence on other major parts of the economy.

But more important than the actual data is whether families think they are better off. In an August 22nd USA Today/Gallup poll, when asked “Are you and your family better off now than you were four year ago?”, 55% of the respondents said “No”, 42% said “Yes” and 3% didn’t know.5

Secondly, with such a dismal economy, Obama can’t run on his record. So the only thing left for the campaign to do is attack the Romney/Ryan ticket. And according to some, the attack approach is a losing proposition. On Friday two prominent Democratic strategists, Pat Caddell and Doug Schoen, in a Fox News interview, said that the negative tone of the Obama campaign is wearing thin on the public and on swing voters in particular. They are both seasoned Democratic strategists, and are not of the chew-the-opponents-legs-off-to-the-knees ilk but actually say sensible things. When asked what Obama has to do to win, they both agreed that Obama has to change the tone to a positive one. I agree - continuing to argue that the economy has improved and attacking Romney will guarantee Obama’s defeat.

So what if Obama sees the light and takes the second position – that the economy is worse than when he took office? I believe this could be a winning approach. Voters place a lot of respect in someone who can accept responsibility for his actions and propose a change of direction, a new plan. But will he do it? Misters Caddell and Schoen both agreed that in order to win, Obama has to be humble and acknowledge that not everything has been perfect, and admit his mistake in rejecting the Simpson-Bowles commission recommendations. Well I think Hell will freeze over before Obama admits a mistake or appears humble. His extreme narcissism will not allow him to do that. He just can't do it. And as for turning from negative campaigning, he is out of the Chicago political mold, and once a Chicago politician, always a Chicago politician. Both Pat and Doug said that they've seen no indication that Obama will pivot to the center and do what is necessary to get elected. And early coverage of the Democratic National Convention and recent stump speeches by Obama confirm that he is digging in on his position and upping the intensity of the Romney-would-destroy-the-country attack.

I used the word “landslide” in the opening sentence. Obama and Romney are neck-and-neck in the polls. So why do I think there’ll be a landslide for Romney? I’m basing that prediction on the current economy and its similarity to what happened in 1980. Carter was a first-term Democratic president, just like Obama. The economy was dismal, similar to now, but perhaps not even as bad. Two weeks before the election, a Gallup poll showed that Jimmy Carter was at 47% and Ronald Reagan 39%. Reagan won by a landslide, receiving the highest number of electoral votes ever won by a non-incumbent presidential candidate.6 It is a mathematical fact that because of their margin of error, in a tight race polls are very unreliable at predicting landslides.

References

1 United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, unemployment rate, 16 years and older, 2009 through August, 2012

http://data.bls.gov/pdq/SurveyOutputServlet

2 Historical price charts for gasoline, Average Retail Price

http://gasbuddy.com/gb_retail_price_chart.aspx

3 Mundi Commodity Food Price Index, Feb 2009 – Jul 2012

http://www.indexmundi.com/commodities/?commodity=food-price-index&months=60

4 USA Today, “More homes faced foreclosure risk in June”

http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/housing/story/2012-07-12/US-foreclosure-rates/56162704/1

5 Fox News Insider, “Are You Better Off Now Than You Were 4 Years Ago?”

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/08/22/are-you-better-off-now-than-you-were-4-years-ago/

6 Wikipedia, United States presidential election, 1980

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1980



No comments:

Post a Comment