“Social Distancing” Kills
Last month I wrote
about the damage the Center for Disease Control’s (CDC’s) mask and
respirator guidelines were doing to public health. They have since adopted more
reasonable guidelines, recommending that everyone wear a mask in public instead
of the former insane statement that “For the general American public, there is
no added health benefit to wear a respiratory protective device.” How many
American lives did this cost? They still stop short of making the best recommendation,
which is for everyone to wear an N95 respirator in public. The N95 respirator
is so labeled because it is tested to ensure that it blocks 95% of pathogens,
thereby protecting the wearer against infection. (Yes, I know they’re scarce
and medical professionals need them most, but there are homemade alternatives which
are almost as good.) See this study
report.
The CDC continues
to make unfounded, unscientific and dangerous recommendations. The subject of
this article concerns social distancing. The CDC states “To practice social or
physical distancing, stay
at least 6 feet (2 meters) from other people.” The media and government
officials make the harmful recommendation worse by using the term “practicing safe
social distancing.” The implication is that if we remain 6 feet apart, we are
unlikely to become infected.
But important
research done by Dr. Lydia Bourouiba, Assistant Professor at MIT and researcher
of Applied Mathematics, along with companion researchers, starting in 2014 and
continuing through this year have revealed that “pathogen-bearing droplets from
a sneeze can
travel 23 to 27 feet propelled only by the person’s ballistic release
of air.” And with indoor ventilation systems and outdoor wind currents, no
practical limit can be stated beyond which it is safe to be from an infected
person. Just today, Fox News contributor, Dr. Janette Nesheiwat stated that
virus born clouds could remain viable for up to 2 hours. How many have become
infected and died while keeping six feet or more from an infected person or
unknowingly walking into a viral aerosol cloud? By its misleading social
distancing guidelines, the CDC has blood on its hands by withholding the truth which
would enable us to stay safer.
To my
knowledge, there are no scientific studies which support the CDC assertion that
the Chinese corona virus "spreads mainly among people who are in close
contact (within about 6 feet) for a prolonged period." In fact, years of scientific
research and a recent study in a Chinese hospital provide strong evidence to
the contrary.
In 2014, Dr. Bourouiba,
with the assistance of Dr. John Bush, Professor of Applied Mathematics at MIT,
used fluid mechanics to quantify the physics of sneezes and coughs into still
air. They learned some very useful things about the travel of emitted pathogens.
Quoting the
researchers: “We think of the cloud [from a sneeze] as being turbulent, that is
to say very disordered, vigorous motion. If characteristic speed in that cloud
is larger than its settling speed, then it will be dominated more by that
internal cloud motion than by its settling speed. The smaller drops go much farther
than the large drops, because the cloud keeps them afloat. The science shows
that these clouds, particularly under usual conditions of temperature and buoyancy,
have a tendency to go higher in the room and get sucked into the ventilation system.
‘I could be in this end of the building and somebody could be in contact with
my pathogens through the filtration and ventilation system without me actually
meeting that person.’”
“That
COVID-19 pathogens can leave a patient’s room was confirmed by a recent study
in a hospital in Singapore. It was reported in JAMA Network that: “Swabs taken
from the air exhaust outlets tested positive, suggesting that small virus-laden
droplets may be displaced by airflows and deposited on equipment such as vents.”
Hospital
administrators know this, which is why we hear of COVID-19 patients being
placed in “negative pressure” rooms. Under negative pressure, all the pathogens
which escape into the room are quickly evacuated and pass through a filtration
and sterilization system before being evacuated into the atmosphere. It is the
same principle by which bathroom exhaust fans work.
That
ventilation systems move pathogen clouds is not unique to hospital rooms. In
recent computer
simulations done by researchers in Finland, it was demonstrated that pathogens
propelled from a person coughing will quickly spread over multiple aisles in a
grocery store. All it takes is moving air.
I stated
above that no practical limit can be stated beyond which it is safe to be from
an infected person. In reporting on the work of Drs. Bourouiba and others, Peter
Dizikes | MIT News Office reported: “Indeed, the study finds, the smaller
droplets that emerge in a cough or sneeze may travel five to 200 times further
than they would if those droplets simply moved as groups of unconnected
particles.”
Later in
2016, Dr. Bourouiba and others published the results
of high speed camera measurements of actual sneezes. Using two high-speed
cameras, the researchers recorded more than 100 sneezes from healthy human
subjects and captured the fraction of a second during which fluid is expelled
from the mouth and flung through the air. These experiments helped confirm the
engineering analysis results produced in 2014, that pathogen-bearing droplets
from a sneeze can travel 23 to 27 feet.
“Recent work
has demonstrated that exhalations, sneezes, and coughs not only consist of
mucosalivary droplets following short-range semiballistic emission trajectories
but, importantly, are primarily made of a multiphase turbulent gas cloud that
entrains ambient air and traps and carries within it clusters of droplets with
a continuum of droplet sizes. The locally moist and warm atmosphere within the
turbulent gas cloud allows the contained droplets to evade evaporation for much
longer than occurs with isolated droplets. Under these conditions, the lifetime
of a droplet could be considerably extended by a factor of up to 1000, from a
fraction of a second to minutes.”
“Given
various combinations of an individual patient’s physiology and environmental
conditions, such as humidity and temperature, the gas cloud and its payload of
pathogen-bearing droplets of all sizes can travel 23 to 27 feet.”
“In the
latest World Health Organization recommendations for COVID-19, health care
personnel and other staff are advised to maintain a 3-foot (1-m) distance away
from a person showing symptoms of disease, such as coughing and sneezing. The
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends a 6-foot (2-m)
separation. However, these distances are based on estimates of range that have
not considered the possible presence of a high-momentum cloud carrying the
droplets long distances. Given the turbulent puff cloud dynamic model,
recommendations for separations of 3 to 6 feet (1-2 m) may underestimate the
distance, timescale, and persistence over which the cloud and its pathogenic
payload travel, thus generating an underappreciated potential exposure range.”
Conclusion
It would be a
lot more honest, helpful and less dangerous to the public they are commissioned
to protect if the CDC would write:
Stay
as far away from other people as possible. Virus clouds from sneezes and coughs
can be immediately propelled up to 27 feet or farther. Even talking or singing can
emit virus-laden aerosols. In addition to the initial propulsion of pathogens,
there are many variables which make it impossible to recommend a safe distance.
Air conditioning design, room size and how fast people are moving around and
stirring the air inside an enclosed space will affect how far and fast
virus-containing aerosols will travel. Wind speed and direction, humidity, how
fast people are moving and other variables will affect how far and fast
virus-containing aerosols will travel person-to-person outside.
Self-quarantining and immediately sterilizing incoming items such
as mail and groceries is the safest protocol.
This proposed
guideline is actually supported by scientific research, clinical setting
studies and common sense.
No comments:
Post a Comment